Decisions Rendered September 28, 2021
Once again, here are some recent Board Panel Decisions: (1) Timely Objection s This claim was established for the back and consequential psychiatric condition from a 2005 accident, The indemnity was settled, leaving the medical portion open. The carrier performed a records review in 2020. At a hearing in June of that year, claimant's counsel raised no objection to it. However, at a subsequent deposition, they stated on the record that the records review was defective under Section 137 for failure to produce all reports reviewed. Ultimately, at a hearing held in May 2021, claimant's counsel argued for preclusion, which the Law Judge denied. The Board Panel noted that the regulations governing record reviews require an adverse party to raise a "timely objection," but does not give a specific deadline by which an objection must be made. However, given the circumstances of the claim, which included the scheduling of three hearings and one deposition...